1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hey please check out our new forum Suggestions and Ideas found in the area "The Bay" - as we love all your ideas and want to collect them in one place, - please use it going forward. :) Thanks already for helping to make Battle Bay an even better experience. Remember: If your idea already exists - simply add your comment or like to an existing one so we avoid duplicates.
    Dismiss Notice

Suggestion thread, balance changes

Discussion in 'Game Discussion' started by Zombie, 4 Aug 2017.

  1. Zombie

    Zombie Active Member

    Joined:
    4 Aug 2017
    Messages:
    125
    bias? i play fixer too i really don't care about being biased or hating a class or another, i should start record my games i guess and you should test how the battle performs when a side has 3 shoot\def + 2 fixers, shoot\def DPSing while fixers pop 4x pulses, perhaps mine\napalm all around to zone, you literaly do not deal damage on them
     
  2. Miika

    Miika Game Lead

    Joined:
    29 Mar 2017
    Messages:
    953
    Negativity bias means you remember the bad experiences more easily than the good experiences. You don't need to record your games, just look at your battle log and calculate how many battles there were with 2 vs 1 healers and count who won more. The unbiased data shows that actually the team with 1 healer have a slight edge on Ace3 level.
     
    SHOCK151! and Cyberfisch like this.
  3. SharkTank

    SharkTank Active Member

    Joined:
    19 May 2017
    Messages:
    155
    I'm in Ace II, and my battle log shows a slight advantage for 1 fixer over 2.

    BUT, there are many factors that create this effect; namely, that the team with 1 fixer had more shooters (i.e., more firepower), whereas the team with 2 fixers usually had a speeder or enforcer. This means that team had wayyy less firepower to take down the team with one fixer.
     

Share This Page