@Arrow--> So...you just don't believe in personal responsibility then? You want the legit players to continue to suffer farmers' stacks of legendaries? Without having their rewards removed, it'd be much easier for them to dig themselves out of the debt than it should be, and all the while their opposition would have to deal with them having those rewards months before they realistically should. Nuts to that. The rollback was the right answer. As for Rovio's role in this, they've already made it clear it was a flaw. Nobody on team Rovio has denied that, but farmers exploited it. They're in the wrong here. Period, end of story. No blame to be shifted there. The honest players didn't exploit, and didn't get punished, despite knowing the exploit was available. Seems pretty simple to me.
Because they did the right thing, in spite of knowing that there was an easier way to progress? Again, simple stuff. Reward your players who follow the rules, punish the ones that don't. It goes a long way towards building trust between devs and players.
Finally,
@Concerned Citizen - you're right that the biggest concern is an economic one, a point I've touched on a few times in this thread. However, I disagree that this action was too much. In fact, I'd argue that it's perfect: it demonstrates that, F2P or P2P, all players are still subject to the rules. Does it suck to lose regular progress along with the rollback? Sure, but it'd suck even more for the other players if there weren't serious corrective actions taken, and IMO rollbacks were the least disruptive way to clearly and properly undo the damage that was done. Rovio has taken responsibility for their hand in this, it's time the farmers do as well. Out of curiosity, however, what would you have suggested as a more moderate action to take? It just seems to me that doing anything less severe that wouldn't require an exorbitant amount of work on their part to implement wouldn't get the job done. As it stands, a relatively large group were farming very, very hard. Obviously they had progress that wasn't explicitly due to tokens, but everything they gained in the interim was tainted by their ill-gotten boosts, so what's the middle ground? Where would you have drawn the line?
Click to expand...