1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hey please check out our new forum Suggestions and Ideas found in the area "The Bay" - as we love all your ideas and want to collect them in one place, - please use it going forward. :) Thanks already for helping to make Battle Bay an even better experience. Remember: If your idea already exists - simply add your comment or like to an existing one so we avoid duplicates.
    Dismiss Notice
Cookies New Forum - Suggestions and Ideas!

Change Infamy points rule.

Discussion in 'Suggestions & Ideas' started by xbabounex, 20 Dec 2017.

Page 2 of 2
  1. tonberryking98

    tonberryking98 Active Member

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2017
    Messages:
    92
    I thoughts it was a star for winning, a star for doing more than the average damage/healing in a game and another star for doing double the average
     
    tonberryking98, 22 Dec 2017
    #21
  2. BasedCarpen

    BasedCarpen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jul 2017
    Messages:
    1,040
    You are both correct. My point is that there is a system in place that correctly measures individual contribution.
     
    BasedCarpen, 22 Dec 2017
    #22
  3. TheAntiSnipe

    TheAntiSnipe Moon's haunted

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    9,118
    Location:
    Classified top secret ;-)
    Keep it constructive, people!:)
     
    TheAntiSnipe, 22 Dec 2017
    #23
    SlAyEr and Ash KOT like this.
  4. TheAntiSnipe

    TheAntiSnipe Moon's haunted

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    9,118
    Location:
    Classified top secret ;-)
    The contribution measured by the star system IS correct from a computer's perspective, but I disagree with this, the reason being as I stated above. You cannot measure EVERYTHING and keep EVERYONE happy. Today, the infamy system causes new players to protest, and some other players. If changed, it'll lead to every baiter and kiter ragequitting. Though it is not perfect (In that, I agree), I believe it's the best under the current circumstances.
    P. S. I know teammates are sometimes not the best, but baiting and kiting are still viable strategies, which don't count numerically, since you're running full speed with people rarely shooting you until you opening up the ambush.
     
    TheAntiSnipe, 22 Dec 2017
    #24
    The Otherguy likes this.
  5. Aswin

    Aswin Active Member

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2017
    Messages:
    174
    I always have the same doubt. Battle bay have to something change the +/- 24 reward :D
     
    Aswin, 22 Dec 2017
    #25
  6. A55A51N

    A55A51N Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    674
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Finland
    Infamy is already given different amount based on the match. If other team is better on paper, if they win, the get less infamy for the win, and losing team loses a bit less (like 15). If the underdog team would win, they would get more than 24.
    I think the current system is fine, it could be better, but i wouldn’t want it to depend on stars.
     
    A55A51N, 22 Dec 2017
    #26
  7. Epekka

    Epekka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6 May 2017
    Messages:
    945
    Location:
    in the not too distant future
    how about we have stars have somthing to do with infamy gained, like this?

    win
    1 star win/tie +11/12 infamy
    2 star win/tie +23/24 infamy
    3 star win/tie + 30/31 infamy
    0 star win/tie is +5/6 infamy.

    loss
    0 star loss is -30/31 infamy
    1 star loss is - 23/24 infamy
    2 and 3 star loss is -11/12 infamy!

    Do you like it?
     
    Epekka, 22 Dec 2017
    #27
  8. Ash KOT

    Ash KOT MVP

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2017
    Messages:
    2,100
    I like the concept, but curious how you get a 0 star win or a 3 star loss...
     
    Ash KOT, 22 Dec 2017
    #28
  9. Epekka

    Epekka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6 May 2017
    Messages:
    945
    Location:
    in the not too distant future
    If your team has a floater and maneges a win, the floater gets 0 stars. Sometimes in higher level battles, it is possible, however unlikely, for you to get a 3 star loss.
    Even if it almost never happens, the system needs a way to award infamy when it does happen.
     
    Epekka, 22 Dec 2017
    #29
    BasedCarpen likes this.
  10. A55A51N

    A55A51N Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    674
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Finland
    3 star loss is impossible since 1 star comes from winning, but i still like the current system... good idea tho
     
    A55A51N, 22 Dec 2017
    #30
    The Otherguy likes this.
  11. Scourge Argaen

    Scourge Argaen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    9 May 2017
    Messages:
    581
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I don't mind the system as it is, but It would be nice to understand more on the mechanics that calculate star contribution other than saying frost / stuns / fire damage are great for stars.

    Also - When a fixer removes frost / stun effects, does that count as contribution in the same way that applying them does?
     
    Scourge Argaen, 23 Dec 2017
    #31
  12. SlAyEr

    SlAyEr Active Member

    Joined:
    12 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    228
    Yes. Sir
     
    SlAyEr, 24 Dec 2017
    #32
  13. SlAyEr

    SlAyEr Active Member

    Joined:
    12 Jun 2017
    Messages:
    228
    Gud idea..
    But some players only do a supporting role while others feed upon enemies..
    What about them
     
    SlAyEr, 24 Dec 2017
    #33
  14. xbabounex

    xbabounex Member

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Looking to my stats today ... 4088 battles and 2049 victories ... ie win/lose is random due to network connection, team mates and foe behavior,......
    So, if infamy points ared based on win/lose then they are random as well. And the game becomes boring at last.
    To keep interest, you need to show how individual skills increase from day to day. Mesuring individual skills requieres another system than infamy.
     
    xbabounex, 24 Dec 2017
    #34
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page