Can we have equal amount of Fixers in each match on both teams?

I believe you meant 3800

 

Bring back flare stacks LMAO.
Someone should play 5 flare shooter and tag every enemy with flare to nerf that fixer.

 

Posted yesterday:
https://replay.battlebay.net/YSVCWZZW#LCMFKQHL (lost);
https://replay.battlebay.net/LSMGVTNJ#LCMFKQHL (win).
Both vs team with fixer and I hadn't.
Tell me how you could win the lose one

 

Yes but what if you think about person for person? Many people got more of those 99% win match, many less. Is it right or not? So what? Just balance it and this problem will be fixed.

 

That's what make the game thrill, intense. It makes you to think how to break their defense. No one want to play like bots: shoot, heal all the time. Flare, big torp, napalm are ur best friends. Review your win, other ppl win vs fixer, u may learn more

 

I'd say, look at the last 50(?) battles you had a 0v1 fixer game.

• If your win-rate is around 50%, you're doing as you're supposed to.
• If your win-rate is significantly higher, you seem to be doing exceptionally good at those match-ups.
• If your win-rate is significantly lower, you're doing bad at those match-ups, and you should reconsider how you play at those games.

Anyways good luck getting into NML, it's not an easy task to do (unless you have full T5 epic setup, then it's easier)

 

*reads first sentence*
*writes post*
make each match have 1ofeachship.
if matchamaking is difficult, display a message warning to chance boats.
nerf shooter: 10% less hp could do (i could or could not be a mk5 defender with 7.6k hp against shooter mk6s with 8k or more hp, right, SeaNavy?)
howd you find me without a tag...... stalker

 

Maybe, maybe not. I could be a defender with 10.6k hp facing 10k+ hp shooters, right CaffeinatedChris?

 

I might be the mk3 defender with 4.5k hp who fights against mk5 shooters with 3k, lol (it's still nor real advantage because they have too strong weapons-t4E sometimes and t4R almost always)
only 7.6k hp? even my mk3 has 4.5k hp (no offense ofc)
yes, hp nerf for shooter would be good (and I play shooter in events and I use it to complete quests in normal mode), maybe not 10% but hp nerf would work

 

then what? -500hp?
mk 1 with 160 hp will dominate!
yes youll find me. im the one with lucky teammates, ok weapons (exept for me new pretty flare), and horrible mini shileds. *i need a chug jug*

what if (a reply not a post or else i will get smacked on)
mk1 starts with 5000 hp
but as you upgrade (in this case, degrade)
you get less hp.
but!
you can fit shileds

 

maybe scale the nerf
that might work better

 

Mk1: -5000 hp, -50 def
Mk2: -10000 hp, -100 def
Mk3: -15000 hp, -150 def
Mk4: -20000 hp, -200 def
Mk5: -25000 hp, -250 def
Mk6: -30000 hp, -300 def
Mk7: -35000 hp, -350 def

I think that'll make it balanced enough

 

perfect!

 

Battles Played last night: 20 (was playing almost all enforcer last night for quests, so my win% isn't as good against fixer teams)

Win / Loss / Tie record for various fixer setups in battle
Zero Fixer to Zero Fixer: 1-0 (1 battles played)
Zero Fixer to One Fixer: 4-5 (9 battles played)
One Fixer to Zero Fixer: 2-1 (3 battles played)
One Fixer to One Fixer: 3-2 (5 battles played)
One Fixer to Two Fixer: 1-0 (1 battles played)
Two Fixer to One Fixer: 0-1 (1 battle played)
Two Fixer to Two Fixer: 0-0 (0 battle played)

So out of the 20 battles:
45% of my battles played consisted of the enemy team having a fixer and my team not having one
15% of my battles my team had the fixer and the enemy team did not.

So, rolling average after two nights: 55 battles
43.6% of my battles played consisted of the enemy team having a fixer and my team not having one
14.5% of my battles my team had the fixer and the enemy team did not.

THIS IS NOT A COMPLAINT. I am just posting statistics from my own experience that show whatever algorithm BattleBay uses for matchmaking, some players play a much higher proportional amount of battles without a fixer and the enemy team having a fixer. The play style of any particular person may be different than my own, and possibly they are losing 60% of these battles, while some of us may win 60% of those types of battles. The fixer presence definitely changes the dynamic of the battle, for better or for worse, depending on play style. So I can see why some people would get frustrated not having a balanced amount of matches with/without fixers.

 

You didn't answer. Just kidding me. I said: that battle couldn't be win without a fixer and it's a fact. Then, I know how to kick fixer's azzes, thanks. I usually win also those battles, but some battle with unbalanced fixers can't be win. (.) DOT.

 

And that's what I'm trying to say since the begin about that tab of statistics.

 

Sorry but I think it's not true because many battle still can be played without fixers in both teams.. have you seen my battle posted? It was not possibile to win just because we hadn't a fixer in our team. And it's a fact. So I just have to pray that in those battles matchmaking put me in the fixer team?
This one: https://replay.battlebay.net/YSVCWZZW#LCMFKQHL

 

More fire power? Not always. Sometime fixer team got more shooters than mine without fixer. And that battle is an example, but often happen that fixer close itself around mines, allies and walls and u can't do almost anything. And if u try to attack and go back in group, your damage will be absorbed by fixer, their damage on u stay there and u just have to shut up and retry. It's not right.