Why is this system so nonsense?

Rewards have been reduced
They were mk7 2600 infamy
They were cow Players
All my mony pearls is good?
I infamy 3850 now 2700 why
What does the system work on?
Check out these pictures my id:Quasar714

 

You must have dropped 800 Infamy below your best,as a result your rewards are reduced from Penalty

 

Your rewards have been reduced because you dropped more than 800 infamy from your highest. Idk what the other questions mean.

 

It can be natural when season starts

 

No, that's far too big a drop. OP is doing something wrong.

 

I wouldn't be so sure. It also happened to me before that I dropped more than 1100 infamy because I was constantly being matched with team mate that just refuse to co-operate (and they can't handle enemy solo either).

 

It happens.
It happened to me before. (From around 3100 to 1900)
It's totally involuntary, the match making just didn't let me win.

 

No, it didn't happen to you either. It's an excuse you make for yourself. Noone drops that much because of their teammates. People drop 100 infamy because of that, or 200. Not 1000. If you drop 1000, you've been playing badly.

 

So convenient for you to just dismiss matchmaking problems like this.
What does playing badly even mean?
Sure, plenty of people play better than me. Would it be fair comparison to compare a top player with a random guy, though? How does it reflect how well or poor I did in battle compared to others.
Comparing with my own performance, then? Who are you to say that I played worse than when I climbed up my top?
I don't know if you are implying that I was tanking or I didn't try to win.
You are lucky you don't experience pro-longed losing streak. But please don't insult other people.

 

I'm comparing you with your own performance, yes. To drop so much, you have to play significantly worse than you did when you reached the high point. It's not an insult unless you find truth insulting.

Edit: also, I played over 6500 battles, and I never dropped 1000 infamy. Not even when I quit the game for 4 months and returned to find everyone else stronger while my ship had stayed the same. That is not lucky, that is me being consistent in my play and not playing worse because I got mad over a few losses.

 

I don't consider myself to be a very good player, so I generally don't find it insulting if people don't consider me good.
I don't always blame loses on matchmaking, either. For matches that the enemy played well, I would praise them.
However, if match after match, I kept being placed in team with suicidal yellow ships, ships that don't co-operate, floaters, I don't think it's unfair to blame the matchmaking.
What I found insulting was that you totally dismissed the effect of matchmaking putting player in a non-cooperating team and blame me totally for the losing.
You totally dismissed the possibility of a pro-longed losing streak without basis (doesn't mean losing 100%. >80% is bad enough.)

It's said that we have to get into this discussion.
I only wanted to raise awareness that losing 1000+ infamy is totally possible even when you are trying to play well.

 

Again, it doesn't prove that you are not lucky, and it definitely doesn't prove that it's not impossible.

 

It's not.

I don't blame you for a loss. I blame you for many losses over time. Anyone can lose a game because of bad teammates, but bad players don't magically get put into your team every match. For example, if there are 9 other players in a match besides yourself, and on average 1 is a suicidal yellow ship, then the chance for a suicidal yellow to be in your team is 4/9. The chance for that to happen twice in a row is 16/81, etc. You starting to understand it? The chance for bad players to end up in your team and not on the enemy team 10 times in a row is already very, very small, and then we're still only talking about a max infamy loss of 240. You cannot lose 1000 in this way, the chance to get bad teammates so many times while the enemy always has better players is as good as zero.

It's statistics. The effect of other players averages out over many battles, and only your own contribution (or lack thereof) remains. Losing 1000 means you did something wrong, and trying to deny it and blame it on teammates won't do you any good.

 

No, you don't understand it.
The chance is non-zero. A non-zero chance means it can happen. If it can happen, it will happen.
Also, I already mentioned in my previous message that:

Not 100% consecutive losses, but a losing ratio over a not very long period of time.
Also, as I already mentioned, I don't always blame teammates for losses. I blamed those that are suicidal, non-cooperating, and floaters!
For your information, I have already climbed back up.
Fair point that blaming teammates won't do any good. But what good does it do for you to deny something that can happen has happened?

 

I don't even know why you are arguing this.
During that prolonged loss, it left me very frustrated.
However, I am not even blaming anyone when I posted in this thread.
I am merely suggesting that it can happen.

 

Did you know that quantum mechanics tells you that when you throw a ball at a wall, there's a chance it will go through instead of bouncing back? Or that statistical physics tells you there's a chance that all the heat in a room will move to one point instead of spreading out?

That a chance is non-zero does not at all mean it will happen.