Increasing Battle Bays profitability

1. I believe like most other MMO games there are options for subscriptions the longer the subscription the better value to a dedicated customer.
(these dont have to be the prices Rovio sets but just as an example) A MMO RPG I used to play a long time ago charged for subscriptions $3.00/week, $7.00/month, $20.00/3 months, $38.00/6 months, $65.00/year.

It would be nice to see Battle Bay scale subscriptions to benefit players that are willing to stick around for a year.

2. I think there should be another shop/category within the shop but for perks.
Example: same idea as epic chests 3900 Pearl's for 10 perk chests maybe 2-5 guaranteed legendary perks and 13-20 epic perks and the rest are rare perks....Zero common perks because that would be a waste of Pearl's since they pop up so much in the market already.
I think these would increase the profitability of battle bay which in turn would allow for more growth and development and enable more game changes to be made that players are requesting.

Please comment below if you think either of these won't help and please describe why.
Dont forget to vote! You are allowed two votes!

 

So each option for a year:

Week: 156$/year
Month: 84$ ( much cheaper)
3 month: 80$ ( maybe slightly reduce this thingy' price)
6 month:76$

I like to put the dollar sign after the number, putting it before sometimes makes me say 'dollar(s) 76'. Also it just looks nicer to put it after.

 

If BB starts earning more cash for rovio then they will focus more on upgrading rovio and thus the game will be better. Leasing to more munz.


Currently the thing that needs to be focused on the most is the experience for new players. New players are potential munz, but many of them are being turned away due to sealclubbers and general Bad matchmaking. Infamy floors should be added, that way pesky mk5s don't go down into warrior and stay in master league.

 

https://forum.battlebay.net/threads/vip-subscription.21674/

 

I 100% agree with that statement it's not right to have a lv50 play against a lv5-lv40 especially the lv5-lv15 players are just figuring out if they like the game

 

I like your thread it makes alot of sense aswell I think we both are onto something positive