Better benefits in rivalries

Hi,
Currently, you get no better benefit from doing well (completing more boards). You only get harder opponent afterwards. So it's like a punishment for doing well.
Therefore I suggest a much higher reward for completing successive boards. For example: 20000 tokens instead of always just the 12k.
Right now, guilds that are completing very few quests are getting rewarded with an easy rivalry & guilds that are doing well are being punished with very hard rivalries. We're is the fairness in that? Should we just intentionally be crap or not play at all?
I suggest a recommendation of that as well.

 

In my opinion, the matchup system is just flawed. We'd be better off with some sort of "guild infamy" that is gained and lost based on which place your guild finishes in. That way, the exact number of quests completed would be taken out of the equation, which removes the feeling of being punished for completing too many as well as removes some possible exploits.

 

Exactly! Great idea!

 

I concur Paul, very valid point, some sort of tier system would promote more productive contributions I feel...

 

I agree with this system. WIth this system that Paul suggested it will eliminate the whiners who were always whining about the rivalry matchmaking. It can get the Guild to focus more on guild quests than who wins and who loses.

 

I dont have any motivation to win the first place trophies maybe somekind of parts or more guild tokens a the first places

 

The members of the winning guild should all get a stack of Belgian waffles at the end of the rivalry, now THAT will be something...