Fixer vs no fixer

Title is self explanatory...very often one team has a fixer and the orher has none, matchmaking should not allow this, it is so retarded I'm surprised it's even a thing, I've seen games with 2 fixers vs none, I mean what the actual fuck? /facepalm

 

Do we have a fixer? Great, if we protect him/ her we'll have more HP on our side! Do they have a fixer and we don't? Great, more firepower on our side!

 

Do they have a fixer? No matter how much damage we make we will slowly die this is the truth most of the time, I knew some1 was going to give this kind of reply... Please avoid this kind of comment cos they make the same sense as the actual matchmaking.

 

I suggest using more point damage weapons so you can focus the fixer. A lot of games your team doesn't focus the fixer very well, so I try and almost exclusively target the fixer until it dies. Flare is a great weapon to kill fixers with if u can get the -30% healing talent

 

Then rush an attack. Sheez.

 

I'm not here to ask for suggestions, I want this crap removed, refrain yourself from such comments, you just sound compliant.

 

Oh, sorry! I guess we didn't understand you were just trying to tell you're frustrated because your idea of fairness is inaccurate
You can always start your thread with a "don't answer if you disagree"

 

Worst part is when the other team has a fixer plus 4 shooters...while as your team lacks that firepower.
The best solution to this issue is to either capture or flank them

 

Oh wow. Sorry. I didn't know that the Fixer hurt your feelings.

 

Well I play fixer and I like it a lot, I like healing in most of games, so no it doesn't hurt me, you're just trying to be sarcastic and failing to do so. What hurts the game is the imperfect matchmaking, in most games healers are matched with other healers, even tanks are matched with tanks to create an as much as possible balanced match, if you don't understand this I can't help it. Bare in mind that I'm not happy to be on the team who's got the healer as well. Also tho who said I don't wan't different opinions to reply, this is to communicate an issue to the developers, not to chit chat, idc if u agree or not.

Edit:typos

 

As a fixer, I don't see the issue. The match is decided by how well the teams gel together and how smart they play. I've had games where we have comfortable wins, others where we get annihilated.

 

I agree. The only real issue I see in these sorts of matches is player skill. The vast majority of players in the 0-2k infamy range are very, very conservative players. That becomes a huge problem in a strategic situation where aggression is the only hope for winning. IMO that's why most of the teams with no fixer lose against fixer teams... they simply don't take advantage of the 25% boost in firepower they have. Instead, they let it devolve into a war of attrition -- a war which the no-fixer team must inevitably lose.

 

This very rarely works out this way, a fixer is generally surrounded by team players and Can heal the equivalent of another 3 players for the team. I have been on teams that have dealt three times as much as the enemy team and still lost the match.

It adds a very unfair advantage to the enemy team to be able to replenish health and the other not. It gives unnatural longevity to the length of time the enemy team can sustain massive damage.

 

I agree with this but there is no way to effectively orchestrate this with a team full of strangers, and if you are the one that rushes correctly then you only end up suiciding.

I think the lack of effective communicate options plays a part here, as well as the inability to fleet with more guild members who have the ability to discuss and execute strategy.