Guild rivalry fixing

This new guild rivalry fixing is very poor.
This week we got a team which is globally in top 10 guilds. Is it because we did 55 quests last week? Although our ranking is only around 300.
It's very disappointing rivalry fixing we are doing our best but not for a good result.
I think they should do according to global rankings and that too they need to setup a range of around 100 rankings ahead or below present rankings

 

No thanks.
We rank in the top 15, sometimes top 10 but our guild is 90% f2p.
You think we should have to face booster guilds every week because of our infamy?

I'm sure it was nice for you guys to pick up a free win every rivalry before the update but I'm quite enjoying having a chance to actually compete for the tokens.

 

I am not talking about competitiveness We also compete very hard for tokens but it makes no sense fixing a mk5 guild with mk7.
They have very high damging weapons and hence can do these quests very easily.

 

Finally you say "AND infamy", thank you .

 

The new rivalry system is bullshit and another way to earn money.
It just favours guilds with money to throw around and is shit for f2p guilds.
Here is an example to show how biased it is towards guild who spends money.
Let's say there is a canon specific quest.
F2p ( no boost): let's say a player did 1000 dmg with canon in a match while fleeting up so dmg recorded will be.
1000*2*10= 20000.
P2w( 5x boosts ): let's say Thier player also did 1000 dmg with canon while fleeting up so dmg recorded will be.
1000*2*10*5= 100000.
So there is a difference of 80000 dmg just by equiping single 5x boost well played rovio not for even once you can create a single thing with even a remote sense of balance

 

And the whine goes on

And on

And on

And...

 

boost 5x it's like boost 5x. Thats all.

 

The ratio value is same but the dmg difference is large imo rivalry should made on the basis of both infamy of the guild and no of quests completed not on the single aspect as it leads to unfair matchups

 

And in the old one? boosts didnt matters?

 

in this way u could meet a dead guild ... and it's would be looks like : 3 guild fights for the 1st place with 48 quests + - ... and rest will have 0-10... so it's rovio position here... more or less justly ... game can't be completle free to play... devs wanna eat also = )

 

The thing you are quoting was old system based solely on infamy m proposing based on both infamy and quests completed last rivalry.
People will always buy boosts this way more competitive guild will compete with more competitive so boost bought will be same.
Devs have plenty of way to earn money.
Money is not an issue here and who said just one thing will make this game completele f2p this game will have to walk a long walk to even come close to being f2p

 

The system has really proved benefits for very High infamy low spending guilds who stood no chance wallet warriors ... However as a mid-Infamy guild ours we were never matched against those wallet warriors and and so are 100s of other F2P guilds, we managed quite a few wins in old system by being more active. Now we constantly finish 3rd,which i don't mind... However current system as goood as it is needs a little tweak. By allowing every guild to grab a win once in a while (may 6 rivalry cycle if they don't win until then).. Just my opinion!

 

I love the new guild system. Why complain? It's basically free loot.

 

The issue is the rivalry portion. Even if they scrap the rivalry part and guilds will still be awesome.

 

Lemme guess, you’re in a weak guild that enjoys being paired up against low-infamy, active guilds. You benefit from this idiotic change, and then complain that players that say it’s unfair are crying. Congratulations—you are officially a full-blown loser.

 

It’s hard to tell a “wallet-warrior” vs a guild that simply puts more effort in. And it’s usually a blend of money and effort anyway. Regardless—that guild is devoting more towards wins and therefore shouldn’t be penalized. Even if it was just a bigger-spender—that’s the stuff that supports the F2P players so the F2P players should STFU and say “thank you”!

 

I would be happier if they scrapped it rather than rewarding average or below-average guilds to keep getting lame first-place trophies and 42k tokens. It’s so unfair that I’d prefer that no one gets it.