Rewards for winning due to a capture but did not capture.

Several times, my team won a battle due to capturing the point. However, I did not spend time in the capture point so I received less rewards.

I think this is unfair because I was still integral to the win due to providing cover fire from a different tactical point. I helped my team gain more time to capture the point by not being on the point.

I suggest to reconsider the scoring for winning teammates that were not on the point in a capture win.

 

Eh, I'm pretty sure rewards are not dependent on being in the capture point.

 

I had rewards that equated to the same amount as losing even though my team won due to capture point. The only difference was that I never touched the capture point.
I'm positive it's not the same.

 

Rewards for winning by capture are smaller than winning by total destruction.

 

Well, when I won by capture and on being on the capture point for all 100%, I received rewards that was equivalent to winning by destruction.

 

Just ask @Miika

 

I've played over 2k games and maybe have been in a capture game 10 times. Is it really that big of a deal?